OBAMA VOUS EMMERDE

After chasing the black and mestizo child in Germany, here is stalking children in schools in france

No to hunt for undocumented in schools
The signatories vigorously condemn the use of children as a means of blackmail to trap undocumented parents, which can only create distrust of families and lead to the risk of dropout children in violation of the right to the education; an attempt to intimidate staff of National Education, citizens and elected officials who expressed their solidarity with the families threatened in the name of respect for fundamental rights (including the right to family life and children's rights ).

They can not accept a situation in which the staffs of National Education can work calmly and ensure their mission to students who come to school in fear.

Initial signatories: RESF 93 - FSU 93 - 93 SNUipp - CGT educ'action 93 - SOUTH-93 Education - LDH 93 - MRAP 93 - 93 UNSA Education - CIPF 93 - departmental union FO 93 --

Background:

A mother of the family, Mrs. Haijuan CHEN, was arrested and placed in police custody Wednesday, September 27 in the morning to the police of Aubervilliers. This family lives in Pantin where her child is in school since September 2005. She fulfilled the criteria "objectives" of the circular dated 13 June 2006 (length of stay, children born in France and in school for at least one year), yet it has been notified of a refusal regulation in this connection on July 28, 10 days after the convocation.

This alerted the teachers in the school group Lolive Jean de Pantin and elected officials of Aubervilliers were concerned about his fate and have tried unsuccessfully to get accurate information from the police. It was not until Thursday, September 28 to learn by management of foreigners in the prefecture of Seine-Saint-Denis that Ms. Chen was transferred to the police in Bobigny. A deputy mayor of Pantin, Philippe Lebeau, called the Commission. He said that Ms. Chen was released. In fact, Ms. Chen is still unavailable and her husband do not see it return to their homes. We will learn only the following day, Friday, September 29, it was the subject of an order for escort to the border of the prefect of Seine-Saint-Denis and was remanded in custody the previous day and 16 H 45 to deposit Paris.

Meanwhile, Friday, September 29, the police conducted several investigations to locate the child and his father. The first occurs at the centre of recreation and kindergarten Anne Sylvestre of Auberviliers claiming that the mother has been released and is seeking his son. Then in kindergarten Jean Lolive in Pantin where police say they want to make sure that Paul is well schooled in this school and say that parents are concerned about the fate of their child. On September 30, they appear again in the nearby elementary school, while the Inspector of Education (NEI) came in kindergarten legitimize the intervention of the police in the school.

Our reaction:

The right to education for all children living in the territory french, instead of the school, the role of teachers are at the centre of a new case of expulsion in Pantin. Yet the Act continues to assert the right to education of all children, regardless of the situation of the family. Position reaffirmed by the International Convention on the Rights of the Child. The French company may be welcomed.

A circular of Education (c96-156, May 29, 1996) provides that the headmaster, in the main, or at school director, responsible for the orderly at the United Nations that it is' determining whether third parties for the establishment must be included. The circular indicates that particular attention must be paid to people who are required to enter the facility for the execution of the public service mission in which they are invested, including the police authorities acting under a preliminary investigation. The same circular reiterates the obligation to facilitate the work of police forces acting on a letter rogatory judge or as part of an investigation of flagrante delicto (eg as a result of a crime or of a crime from being committed within the institution or its surroundings).

In these circumstances,

What about the arrival of the police at a school to inquire about the presence of a child under the pretext concern of the mother supposedly liberated? What about an intervention by the hierarchy of national education in the school itself, to support these acts? What about the request made by the police to the school's principal to decline his identity in his office?

This school was she faced with a situation of danger, violence or trying there to make it a cog in the establishment of a repressive policy against immigrant populations?

The signatories vigorously condemn the use of children as a means of blackmail to trap undocumented parents, which can only create distrust of families and lead to the risk of dropout children in violation of the right to the education; an attempt to intimidate staff of National Education, citizens and elected officials who expressed their solidarity with the families threatened in the name of respect for fundamental rights (including the right to family life and children's rights ).

They can not accept a situation in which the staffs of National Education can work calmly and ensure their mission to students who come to school in fear.

They call for a rally Monday, October 2 at 17 h 30 before kindergarten Jean Lolive, 46 avenue Edouard Vaillant in Pantin. A press conference will take place at the end of the rally.

Initial signatories: RESF 93 - FSU 93 - 93 SNUipp - CGT educ'action 93 - SOUTH-93 Education - LDH 93 - MRAP 93 - 93 UNSA Education - CIPF 93 - departmental union FO 93-Link

Parents ask here and then claiming the planned petition to that effect with parents of pupils because stalking continuous.Mr BRICE HORTEFEUX continued its hunt for undocumented